Offsuited especification

[77pockets]

Is it ok to make this?

When in SmallBlind and StackSize <= 3 and opponents = 1 and not (hand = 72 offsuited or hand = 62 offsuited or hand = 52 offsuited or hand = 42 offsuited or hand = 32 offsuited or hand = 43 offsuited) RaiseMax Force

Wich I want to mean, if when in HU in SB and stack<3bb shove everything but not 32o-72o and 43o

[77pockets]

else, can I do it ?
When StackSize <= 10 and in smallblind
  When (hand = A suited or hand = KJ suited or hand = QJ suited or hand = JT suited or hand = T9 suited or hand = 98 suited)
RaiseMax force

[Egor]

Both codelines are valid.

But you should not use opponents =1 for the first orbit. If you want to steal from the small blind say:

When stilltoact = 1 and StackSize <= 3 and raises = 0 and calls = 0 and not (hand = 72 offsuited or hand = 62 offsuited or hand = 52 offsuited or hand = 42 offsuited or hand = 32 offsuited or hand = 43 offsuited) RaiseMax Force

[77pockets]

thanks egor

in your opinion is this the best line if I make a hu bot?

[Egor]

I don't know what you mean by HU bot

if you mean for HU tables, then you only need to worry about calls = 0 and raises = 0 to know you are in the small blind

[77pockets]

yes, HU tables.

[Egor]

Well that's a lot easier because you don't have to worry about an opponent count. Any time the bot is faced with a decision you know you have exactly one opponent who is still in the hand. Preflop you really don't need to worry about anything other than the raise/call count for the first orbit. You can use position = last after the first orbit to know when you are in position.

[77pockets]

thanks egor!

Sorry, you can't repeat a karma action without waiting 72 hours. 

[77pockets]

Well that's a lot easier because you don't have to worry about an opponent count. Any time the bot is faced with a decision you know you have exactly one opponent who is still in the hand. Preflop you really don't need to worry about anything other than the raise/call count for the first orbit. You can use position = last after the first orbit to know when you are in position.

In a HU table can I use this command to effective stack sizes? If Me or opponent has less than 10bb

When MinStillToActStackSize <= 10

[Egor]

That will only work first orbit (first time to act preflop) when you are in the small blind, and it tells you if your opponent has a crippled stack or not.

Probably time to push with a lot of hands and gamble on breaking them. 

[77pockets]

yes, but is there a way to do effective stack sizes? this is very important

[Egor]

Not sure what you mean. Stacksize < = > is your own stacksize.

[77pockets]

Not sure what you mean. Stacksize < = > is your own stacksize.

eff stack size, is the smaller stack between players in a hand

example.

me 10bb
vilain 15bb

eff stack = 10bb


example2

me 10bb
villain 7bb


eff stack = 7bb



In HU is very important the eff stack size to know what shoving, folding and calling ranges

[Egor]

You know what the opponent's stacksize is and you know what your stacksize is. Isn't that enough?

When MinStillToActStackSize <= 10 and stacksize > 10 (you know you have them covered)

When MinStillToActStackSize > 15 and stacksize < 15 (you know you don't)

[77pockets]

Is that ok to use this?

(StackSize <= 25 and > 20 or MinStillToActStackSize  <= 25 and > 20)

[Egor]

No. I don't understand what you are trying to do there.

You can say this:

When stacksize <= 25 and stacksize > 20

When MinStillToActStackSize  <= 25 and MinStillToActStackSize > 20

[77pockets]

I want to use a x  shove range to 20-25bb stack effetive

So if my stack is between 20-25bb or the villain stack is between 20-25bb I will use this x shove range

[Egor]

So just make a codeblock:

When (stacksize <= 25 and stacksize > 20) or (MinStillToActStackSize  <= 25 and MinStillToActStackSize > 20)
  when raises = 0 and (hand = 73 or hand = 72) raisemax force

...must be placed below all "1-liner" commands in the preflop section, otherwise the 1-liners will be tied to the open when condition at top

[77pockets]

Thanks Egor!

lol about the 73 and 72